Good. The subject of violence in video games did not start yesterday, actually there since ... the game is, quite simply. It was not expected to have super realistic 3D games for the right thinking people believe that from the moment we have fun killing people virtually pixilated, it becomes dangerous to society. But then I hop MYSELF cites the article I am writing already, and is valid for all media. Of course all the players of Call of Duty has a criminal record and having warmed up for a few hours on the game, leaving guns and will make a killing in a kindergarten. I myself also of children locked in my basement. And given how the war games make us violent, we should start worrying because we more than 4.7 million future potential killers . Horror.
Although France was entitled to the same puritanism on the part of our policies, if you're interested, the case Rule Of Rose proves very well. But in Germany, accusing video games of anything and everything seems to be a national sport, as evidenced by this compendium of quotations I strongly recommends that you visit. For several cases of "school-shooting", you know, Columbine-style massacre, there was in Germany, Erfurt in 2002 at Emsdetten in 2006, or more recently in 2009 Winnenden. And because you have a scapegoat, the game is on the front line, and thus born the term "killerspiele" or set of killer. There followed a huge campaign against video games where enchainent blunders of all kinds, we made links with child pornography (Oh How I love that word!) Borked, it advocates the prohibition of any going, we lied about the content games ... And of course the public are found affected as on a survey in Germany, 72% said that "killerspiele" were responsible for these massacres. We even developer Crytek who dare say his job. The point of no return is reached when a minister of the interior is the most crappy reasoning I've ever heard.
"All those who have killerspiele on their computers do not become mass murderers. However, the vast majority of mass killers that we have seen in recent years have practiced this kind of games. There is a connection between the two. " Uwe Schünemann. Here
then. He has the good sense to say that is because we played Counter Strike that from killing his family, but suddenly his argument no longer holds the road because I could easily say that all who ate french fries do not become mass murderers, but it is likely that mass killers are eating, so there is a link between the two. I saw more logical syllogisms. In a word, I say: LOL.
On rit, on rit, certes. Il est incroyable de voir cette extrême, on ne peut même plus faire confiance aux parents pour ne pas laisser jouer leurs enfants à des jeux violents, I also saw a mother being advised by a vendor last Splinter Cell yet categorized 18 + (And she has seen the label) for his young 10 year old son. It does not even trust adults, yet the public affected by these games, since we are obliged to ban these games. And I as I said I wonder why we are not to kill 4.7 million people in the street. Yet these politicians are convinced that these games make violent, and it is amusing and ironic that those who criticize these final games have less sense of reality that the players themselves. For me when I see people play FPS's are a bunch of friends who have fun conviviality, a band of virgins who take themselves too seriously with strategies to con. No future killers. Because at most these games are only games of strategy and action, or new versions of "Cops and Robbers". After all whether it is realistic slap it on a screen, so fictional. And I do not think that has already blamed the lazer quest or paintball to have trained young people to kill, I believe.
the end? I'm not a fan of FPS. I would even say that games with gratuitous violence like Manhunt you deserve the boos. So I do not care just somewhere that we accuse these games. The problem is that when it does, it does so on behalf of all video games. And sometimes, as in the case of Rule of Rose generated where the game has been accused of pedophilia so completely unjustified. (There is no pedophile in the game). And me there I feel like laughing because Rule of Rose is not Call of Duty. It's a game and truly a marvel chiadé artistic, hard and sometimes violent indeed, but far from being immoral. The media and politicians govern public opinion, resulting in the game is still regarded today as a result of a debate as old as time who has more reason to be. And we must harping again and again the same evidence. But I am glad that serious psychologists have studied the issue and were able to award the right and wrong, as Thomas Gaon (Click this link!) Specialist on addiction to video games that j 'I attended his lecture and I completely agree are views on video games. Alas there is still some way to go when you see the current state of affairs in Germany.
Maybe one day will come when the general opinion and find common sense and the game will flourish fully. I hope and waiting when you tell me that the games make them violent, I would laugh very hard to hide my tears.
Band of the Week: The too lazy to find something original, so I opt for a big classic, that Ring of Fire by Johnny Cash. If you know you deserve not just contempt.
0 comments:
Post a Comment